<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Michael Reed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unmusic.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk</link>
	<description>technology, gender and geek culture freelance writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:29:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Men&#8217;s News Daily: Media Coverage of Female Sexual Tourism by Stephen Paterson</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/02/2010/published-articles/mens-news-daily-media-coverage-of-female-sexual-tourism/comment-page-1/#comment-6018</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Paterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=335#comment-6018</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. Here&#039;s a perfectly matching piece by La Bindel, originally perpetrated by the Guardian, to add to your collection:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/07/11/1057783358449.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. Here&#8217;s a perfectly matching piece by La Bindel, originally perpetrated by the Guardian, to add to your collection:<br />
<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/07/11/1057783358449.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/07/11/1057783358449.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Men&#8217;s News Daily: Media Coverage of Female Sexual Tourism by mike</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/02/2010/published-articles/mens-news-daily-media-coverage-of-female-sexual-tourism/comment-page-1/#comment-6009</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=335#comment-6009</guid>
		<description>Thanks to Jim and Cathy for the kind and thoughtful comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Jim and Cathy for the kind and thoughtful comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Men&#8217;s News Daily: Media Coverage of Female Sexual Tourism by Cathy Relf</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/02/2010/published-articles/mens-news-daily-media-coverage-of-female-sexual-tourism/comment-page-1/#comment-6008</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Relf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=335#comment-6008</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

Your comment on my blog got me interested, so I thought I&#039;d take a look. I read your piece on female sexual tourism and found it quite thought provoking. These articles regularly turn up in women&#039;s mags, too, which you don&#039;t mention (perhaps not your preferred reading material!) I&#039;ve just had a leaf through my housemate&#039;s pile of mags and can&#039;t find any examples, but I definitely have read some before and it&#039;s usually in a bit of a confessional tone - &quot;ooh look what I did!&quot; and with a kind of disclaimer at the end saying guess what, this might not be a very safe thing to do.

I&#039;m just speaking off the top of my head here, having not really thought about the subject until now. But it seems to me that people will often behave in the way that we expect them to behave - we generally conform to expectations. So the more we tell women that their emotions entitle them to behave in ways that we would not expect men to, the less responsibility they take for those emotions and their ensuing actions. I see this all the time among my friends, with PMT. You&#039;re expected to act irrationally, therefore it&#039;s ok if you do. But... really... it&#039;s still you that chose to hit your boyfriend, PMTor no. And if we present men who visit prostitutes as monsters and perverts, does it influence them to act the part? That&#039;s probably too strong - I mean something subtler and more hidden in the subconscious. 

If society were already condemning me for one thing - paying a high price for safe sex with a consenting and unpressured woman, for example - perhaps it would be less of a leap to a worse thing - a potentially enslaved, forced, or just plain penniless and hungry woman - than if not. My, that&#039;s a convoluted sentence - I hope it makes sense!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>Your comment on my blog got me interested, so I thought I&#8217;d take a look. I read your piece on female sexual tourism and found it quite thought provoking. These articles regularly turn up in women&#8217;s mags, too, which you don&#8217;t mention (perhaps not your preferred reading material!) I&#8217;ve just had a leaf through my housemate&#8217;s pile of mags and can&#8217;t find any examples, but I definitely have read some before and it&#8217;s usually in a bit of a confessional tone &#8211; &#8220;ooh look what I did!&#8221; and with a kind of disclaimer at the end saying guess what, this might not be a very safe thing to do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just speaking off the top of my head here, having not really thought about the subject until now. But it seems to me that people will often behave in the way that we expect them to behave &#8211; we generally conform to expectations. So the more we tell women that their emotions entitle them to behave in ways that we would not expect men to, the less responsibility they take for those emotions and their ensuing actions. I see this all the time among my friends, with PMT. You&#8217;re expected to act irrationally, therefore it&#8217;s ok if you do. But&#8230; really&#8230; it&#8217;s still you that chose to hit your boyfriend, PMTor no. And if we present men who visit prostitutes as monsters and perverts, does it influence them to act the part? That&#8217;s probably too strong &#8211; I mean something subtler and more hidden in the subconscious. </p>
<p>If society were already condemning me for one thing &#8211; paying a high price for safe sex with a consenting and unpressured woman, for example &#8211; perhaps it would be less of a leap to a worse thing &#8211; a potentially enslaved, forced, or just plain penniless and hungry woman &#8211; than if not. My, that&#8217;s a convoluted sentence &#8211; I hope it makes sense!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Men&#8217;s News Daily: Media Coverage of Female Sexual Tourism by James H</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/02/2010/published-articles/mens-news-daily-media-coverage-of-female-sexual-tourism/comment-page-1/#comment-6004</link>
		<dc:creator>James H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=335#comment-6004</guid>
		<description>Interesting and well-reasoned article. It&#039;s a shame that a fair proportion of the discussion on both sites seems to come from a rather misogynist viewpoint (eg, accusations that articles like yours are bringing down MND, and the gentle soul who described women as &quot;worthless&quot; on antimisandry) though, since this does those who promote an egalitarian model no favours. Then again, perhaps if you&#039;re annoying feminists AND anti-feminists, you know you&#039;ve pitched things correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and well-reasoned article. It&#8217;s a shame that a fair proportion of the discussion on both sites seems to come from a rather misogynist viewpoint (eg, accusations that articles like yours are bringing down MND, and the gentle soul who described women as &#8220;worthless&#8221; on antimisandry) though, since this does those who promote an egalitarian model no favours. Then again, perhaps if you&#8217;re annoying feminists AND anti-feminists, you know you&#8217;ve pitched things correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RetroGamer: Acorn Archimedes by mike</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/06/2009/published-articles/244/comment-page-1/#comment-5247</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=244#comment-5247</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I&#039;m gradually building up the portfolio. At the same time I&#039;m improving my writing skills and raising my profile, even if the feature writing is taking time and energy away from the book. Obviously, RG is quite cool publication for a geek to be associated with. Hopefully, I&#039;ll be able to do more for them in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I&#8217;m gradually building up the portfolio. At the same time I&#8217;m improving my writing skills and raising my profile, even if the feature writing is taking time and energy away from the book. Obviously, RG is quite cool publication for a geek to be associated with. Hopefully, I&#8217;ll be able to do more for them in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RetroGamer: Acorn Archimedes by Darryl Sloan</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/06/2009/published-articles/244/comment-page-1/#comment-5244</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl Sloan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=244#comment-5244</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s brilliant. I&#039;ll bet you&#039;re thrilled to get a big article published in such a prestigious mag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s brilliant. I&#8217;ll bet you&#8217;re thrilled to get a big article published in such a prestigious mag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Micro Mart: Acorn Archimedes by Michael Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/02/2009/published-articles/micro-mart-acorn-archimedes/comment-page-1/#comment-5223</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=205#comment-5223</guid>
		<description>[...] include some details about the hardware, and the operating system. You might remember that I did a feature on the machine  for Micro Mart in February, but that article didn&#8217;t dwell on the games as much as the history [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] include some details about the hardware, and the operating system. You might remember that I did a feature on the machine  for Micro Mart in February, but that article didn&#8217;t dwell on the games as much as the history [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Geek sitcom script complete by mike</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/01/2008/sitcom-pilot/geek-sitcom-script-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-5064</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=58#comment-5064</guid>
		<description>Hiya Andrew

Thanks for dropping into the site and commenting. Although, I didn&#039;t spend an entire four years writing the script. I had a first crack at it back in 2005 and then went back to it from time to time. I was working on other things at the same time and improving as a writer. See front page of site for links to published articles. I handed it in when I was happy with it, as per the advice on the BBC site.

&quot;Firstly a half hour sitcom script is at least 50 pages, if your script looked thin then it wouldn’t have even been read.&quot;

When you do professional writing, you learn to obey the specs and those were the specs listed on the Writer&#039;s Room site. There&#039;s a rule of thumb that they refer to that says one page should equal one minute of screen time. Try googling for more info. They specified that a sitcom script should be 28 mins. You can find out more about their submission specs on the site - http://www.bbc.co.uk/writersroom/writing/submission_guidelines.shtml

Although, as I say, I&#039;m not going to bother with Writer&#039;s Room for future projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya Andrew</p>
<p>Thanks for dropping into the site and commenting. Although, I didn&#8217;t spend an entire four years writing the script. I had a first crack at it back in 2005 and then went back to it from time to time. I was working on other things at the same time and improving as a writer. See front page of site for links to published articles. I handed it in when I was happy with it, as per the advice on the BBC site.</p>
<p>&#8220;Firstly a half hour sitcom script is at least 50 pages, if your script looked thin then it wouldn’t have even been read.&#8221;</p>
<p>When you do professional writing, you learn to obey the specs and those were the specs listed on the Writer&#8217;s Room site. There&#8217;s a rule of thumb that they refer to that says one page should equal one minute of screen time. Try googling for more info. They specified that a sitcom script should be 28 mins. You can find out more about their submission specs on the site &#8211; <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/writersroom/writing/submission_guidelines.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/writersroom/writing/submission_guidelines.shtml</a></p>
<p>Although, as I say, I&#8217;m not going to bother with Writer&#8217;s Room for future projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Geek sitcom script complete by andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/01/2008/sitcom-pilot/geek-sitcom-script-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-5062</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=58#comment-5062</guid>
		<description>From reading this page it sounds obvious to me why the BBC sent back your script, probably unread. It took you 4 years to write a 28 page script?
Firstly a half hour sitcom script is at least 50 pages, if your script looked thin then it wouldn&#039;t have even been read.
Work on your characters, get to know them intimately, make them come alive.
When you have acheived this a pilot script takes no time at all, for instance I spent two weeks doing my character workshop making them become real. This morning I finished my first draft of a 56 page script which I started yesterday.
Do your work on the characters and they take on a life of their own, think of a plot and a sub plot and if your characters are strong enough they write the script for you.

Very important send it in the correct scrip format if you want it to be read, use courier 12 font.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From reading this page it sounds obvious to me why the BBC sent back your script, probably unread. It took you 4 years to write a 28 page script?<br />
Firstly a half hour sitcom script is at least 50 pages, if your script looked thin then it wouldn&#8217;t have even been read.<br />
Work on your characters, get to know them intimately, make them come alive.<br />
When you have acheived this a pilot script takes no time at all, for instance I spent two weeks doing my character workshop making them become real. This morning I finished my first draft of a 56 page script which I started yesterday.<br />
Do your work on the characters and they take on a life of their own, think of a plot and a sub plot and if your characters are strong enough they write the script for you.</p>
<p>Very important send it in the correct scrip format if you want it to be read, use courier 12 font.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Micro Mart: Acorn Archimedes by mike</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/02/2009/published-articles/micro-mart-acorn-archimedes/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 12:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=205#comment-85</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-81&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Urth&lt;/a&gt;
(CC via email)
Hiya Urthy

Nice to hear from you.

(re: Micro Mart) Heh, it really is a small world. If you turn up as a centerfold model in an issue of Transsexual Times, I&#039;m going to be officially spooked.

I&#039;m sure our paths will cross again at MM/Dennis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-81" rel="nofollow">@Urth</a><br />
(CC via email)<br />
Hiya Urthy</p>
<p>Nice to hear from you.</p>
<p>(re: Micro Mart) Heh, it really is a small world. If you turn up as a centerfold model in an issue of Transsexual Times, I&#8217;m going to be officially spooked.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure our paths will cross again at MM/Dennis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Micro Mart: Acorn Archimedes by Urth</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/02/2009/published-articles/micro-mart-acorn-archimedes/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Urth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=205#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike! We&#039;re magazine buddies! I&#039;ve been doing MM articles for about a year now. To be honest, without them my freelance writing career would have struggled to get going at all, and even now it&#039;s made healthy through my continued contributions to the mag. Glad to see you&#039;re doing well, enjoyed the article (arc-ticle?) too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike! We&#8217;re magazine buddies! I&#8217;ve been doing MM articles for about a year now. To be honest, without them my freelance writing career would have struggled to get going at all, and even now it&#8217;s made healthy through my continued contributions to the mag. Glad to see you&#8217;re doing well, enjoyed the article (arc-ticle?) too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Geek sitcom script complete by mike</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/01/2008/sitcom-pilot/geek-sitcom-script-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=58#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your interest. I&#039;m afraid that I&#039;m not handing out copies of that script at the moment. It was started in 2005 and I consider it to be no longer representative of my current style and a bit embaressing.

Thanks again for the interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your interest. I&#8217;m afraid that I&#8217;m not handing out copies of that script at the moment. It was started in 2005 and I consider it to be no longer representative of my current style and a bit embaressing.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Geek sitcom script complete by kieron</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/01/2008/sitcom-pilot/geek-sitcom-script-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>kieron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=58#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Hey, would you send me your script and I will tell you what I think of it.
Cheers,

Kieron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, would you send me your script and I will tell you what I think of it.<br />
Cheers,</p>
<p>Kieron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Geek sitcom script complete by mike</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/01/2008/sitcom-pilot/geek-sitcom-script-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=58#comment-12</guid>
		<description>It was returned without comment a few months later. Believe it or not, I&#039;m not a fan of Writers&#039; Room any more ;-) You might say that it&#039;s a case of sour grapes, and in all fairness, if I had received a glowing appraisal, I might now be singing the praises of WR.

Now I&#039;ve had more time to think about it, I think that WR encourages a pie in the sky approach to working in entertainment. It&#039;s a bit like those manufactured pop band documentary thingies - when you watch the singers burst into tears, you wonder how they can be contemplating a career in the entertainment industry when they invest so much of themselves in a single audition.

In fact, I think that the BBC have probably created it so that they have a ready answer to all of the people who ask if they can send a script in. When you&#039;re sending your script in against 10,000 other scripts, the whole thing ends up being a lottery. Finishing a 28 page script and a series outline was a useful experience in itself, but it&#039;s too much work to do without a guarantee of payback.

The TUOL script was one of my first attempts at writing something, and in all honesty, it wasn&#039;t that fantastic. Since I first started working on it, I&#039;ve done quite a lot of writing in other fields, and subsequently, I&#039;ve improved as a writer. In particular, some of the earliest material in TOUL now looks a embarrassingly ropey to me. I might one day have a go at resurrecting the characters and the scenario though.

I need do some full treatments for some of my ideas, but I&#039;m not writing a 28 page script again for what amounts to a competition. I might have a go at stand up or see if a local drama club could use a writer. I&#039;m going to try and weasel my way in sneakily and legitimately, rather than betting it all on being really really lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was returned without comment a few months later. Believe it or not, I&#8217;m not a fan of Writers&#8217; Room any more <img src='http://www.unmusic.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  You might say that it&#8217;s a case of sour grapes, and in all fairness, if I had received a glowing appraisal, I might now be singing the praises of WR.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;ve had more time to think about it, I think that WR encourages a pie in the sky approach to working in entertainment. It&#8217;s a bit like those manufactured pop band documentary thingies &#8211; when you watch the singers burst into tears, you wonder how they can be contemplating a career in the entertainment industry when they invest so much of themselves in a single audition.</p>
<p>In fact, I think that the BBC have probably created it so that they have a ready answer to all of the people who ask if they can send a script in. When you&#8217;re sending your script in against 10,000 other scripts, the whole thing ends up being a lottery. Finishing a 28 page script and a series outline was a useful experience in itself, but it&#8217;s too much work to do without a guarantee of payback.</p>
<p>The TUOL script was one of my first attempts at writing something, and in all honesty, it wasn&#8217;t that fantastic. Since I first started working on it, I&#8217;ve done quite a lot of writing in other fields, and subsequently, I&#8217;ve improved as a writer. In particular, some of the earliest material in TOUL now looks a embarrassingly ropey to me. I might one day have a go at resurrecting the characters and the scenario though.</p>
<p>I need do some full treatments for some of my ideas, but I&#8217;m not writing a 28 page script again for what amounts to a competition. I might have a go at stand up or see if a local drama club could use a writer. I&#8217;m going to try and weasel my way in sneakily and legitimately, rather than betting it all on being really really lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Geek sitcom script complete by Aunt Jarrmann</title>
		<link>http://www.unmusic.co.uk/01/2008/sitcom-pilot/geek-sitcom-script-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Aunt Jarrmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unmusic.co.uk/?p=58#comment-11</guid>
		<description>So did you get a response? Are you still working on it? :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So did you get a response? Are you still working on it? <img src='http://www.unmusic.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
